History of the Human Sciences – the international journal of peer-reviewed research, which provides the leading forum for work in the social sciences, humanities, human psychology and biology that reflexively examines its own historical origins and interdisciplinary influences – is delighted to announce details of its prize for early career scholars. The intention of the annual award is to recognise a researcher whose work best represents the journal’s aim to critically examine traditional assumptions and preoccupations about human beings, their societies and their histories in light of developments that cut across disciplinary boundaries. In the pursuit of these goals, History of the Human Sciences publishes traditional humanistic studies as well work in the social sciences, including the fields of sociology, psychology, political science, the history and philosophy of science, anthropology, classical studies, and literary theory. Scholars working in any of these fields are encouraged to apply. Guidelines for the Award Scholars who wish to be considered for the award are asked to submit

an up-to-date two-page CV (including a statement that confirms eligibility for the award) and an essay that is a maximum of 12,000 words long (including notes and references). The essay should be unpublished and not under consideration elsewhere, based on original research, written in English, and follow History of the Human Science’s style guide. Scholars are advised to read the journal’s description of its aims and scope, as well as its submission guidelines. Entries will be judged by a panel drawn from the journal’s editorial team and board. They will identify the essay that best fits the journal’s aims and scope. Eligibility Scholars of any nationality who have either not yet been awarded a PhD or are no more than five years from its award are welcome to apply. The judging panel will use the definition of “active years”, with time away from academia for parental leave, health problems, or other relevant reasons being disregarded in the calculation.…

Congratulations to the joint winners of this year's Early Career Prize, Liana Glew (Penn State) for the essay 'Documenting insanity: Paperwork and patient narratives in psychiatric history' and Simon Torracinta (Yale) for the essay 'Maps of desire: Edward Tolman’s Drive Theory of Wants'. Congratulations also to Erik Baker (Harvard) who received a commendation for the essay 'The ultimate think tank: The rise of the Santa

Fe Institute Libertarian'. All three scholars will be invited to submit their pieces for publication in the journal and will be interviewed about their work for the website soon. Thank you to everyone who submitted essays for consideration for the prize - the editors were very impressed by the high quality of submissions and inspired by the new research early career scholars are currently conducting.

The editors of History of the Human Sciences are delighted to learn that Alexandra Rutherford's 'Surveying Rape,' published in the journal in 2017, has received an honorable mention at the 2019 awards of the Forum for History of Human Science. Rutherford's article is an account of the role that social science methods play in "realizing" sexual assault, amid public discussion of (and conservative-led controversy about) the statistic that 1 in 5 women students on (US) college campus experience sexual assault. Setting aside questions of methodological validity, Rutherford shows how the survey, as a measuring device, has become central to the "ontological politics"

of sexual assault. Drawing on histories of feminist social science, the article suggests that the social and political life of the survey has been a central actor in rendering sexual assault legible: "only by conceptualizing the survey as an active participant in the ontological politics of campus sexual assault," Rutherford argues, "can we understand both the persistence of the critical conservative response to the ‘1 in 5’ statistic and its successful deployment in anti-violence policy." The editors would like to extend their very warmest congratulations to Professor Rutherford for this much deserved recognition. The article is free to download for rest of the month at this link.

The July 2016 issue of History of the Human Sciences (Volume 29, Issue 3) is now published. Abstracts of research articles, plus links to the full text, are below. Elwin Hofman (KU Leuven) - 'How to do the history of the self'' The history of the self is a flourishing field. Nevertheless, there are some problems that have proven difficult to overcome, mainly concerning teleology, the universality or particularity of the self and the gap between ideas and experiences of the self. In this article, I make two methodological suggestions to address these issues. First, I propose a ‘queering’ of the self, inspired by recent developments in the history of sexuality. By destabilizing the modern self and writing the histories of its different and paradoxical aspects, we can better attend to continuities and discontinuities in the history of the self and break up the idea of a linear and unitary history. I distinguish 4 overlapping and intersecting axes along which discourses of

the self present themselves: (1) interiority and outer orientation; (2) stability and flexibility; (3) holism and fragmentation; and (4) self-control and dispossession. Second, I propose studying 4 ‘practices of self’ through which the self is created, namely: (1) techniques of self; (2) self-talk; (3) interpreting the self; and (4) regulating practices. Analysing these practices allows one to go beyond debates about experience versus expression, and to recognize that expressions of self are never just expressions, but make up the self itself. Egbert Klautke (University College London) - '"The Germans are beating us at our own game" - American eugenics and the German sterilization law of 1933' This article assesses interactions between American and German eugenicists in the interwar period. It shows the shifting importance and leading roles of German and American eugenicists: while interactions and exchanges between German and American eugenicists in the interwar period were important and significant, it remains difficult to establish direct American influence on Nazi legislation. German experts of…

We were delighted to publish an in-depth review essay by Colin Gordon, on the new Cambridge Foucault Lexicon, in the July 2016 issue of HHS (Gordon is, among other things, an internationally-renowned scholar of Foucault; he is editor of Power/Knowledge [Pantheon] and co-editor of The Foucault Effect [Chicago]). We were even more delighted that when our colleagues at Sage made the essay open access, a status that will be retained through the end of 2016. You can now access the essay, without subscription, here: http://hhs.sagepub.com/content/29/3/91.full.pdf+html